A very strong reason.
BookMarketingBuzzBlog A unique blog dedicated to covering the worlds of book publishing and the news media, revealing creative ideas, practical strategies, interesting stories, and provocative opinions. Along the way, discover savvy but entertaining insights on book marketing, public relations, branding, and advertising from a veteran of two decades in the industry of book publishing publicity and marketing.
Well, maybe an author from Your first thought might be: They receive tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of books for review each year. Of the zillion titles published each year, ego-filled authors and desperate publishers with limited budgets know enough to at least send a book to The Grey Lady.
So what will make a difference in getting your book reviewed? Write an extraordinarily great book. No screwing around here. Your book literally has to be better than many others. I counted 35 books were reviewed in the June 7 Book Review — and that included several books that got a paragraph each in a long round-up column.
The cover and title need to draw them in. Be famous or highly credentialed. If you are a celebrity it increases the chances of a review, but no guarantees.
They tend to go with bigger publishers and reputable university presses. Their presumption is that vetting took place and the book has perceived value over an indie press and certainly over self-published.
This year’s most promising African newcomer may well prove to be Chigozie Obioma. An Ibo, like Nigeria’s best-known novelist, Chinua Achebe, Obioma was born in southwestern Nigeria and has recently joined the faculty at the University of Nebraska. This hotel was given a favourable review in the New York Times in Perhaps this signalled the height of the owner's aspirations as there has not been a 13 TripAdvisor reviews. Founded in on the principle of bridging the gap between “the street and the elite,” Music Connection has grown from a popular print publication into a spectrum of products and services that address the wants and needs of musicians, the music tech community and industry support services.
Send it to them in a timely manner. You must — without exception — send them an advance review copy at least three and a half months prior to publication. Sending them a copy even a month prior to launch date is too late.
Send them two copies — not one. Send them to the right reviewer, the one that covers your genre. It helps if your book breaks news, is controversial, sheds light on a mystery or matter of history, or provides a new paradigm that could potentially revolutionize how we live. Have a great backstory of how the book came to be and of who you are.
The Times oozes intellect, insight, depth, and a certain probing way that it has to feel it's uncovering and revealing something new and unusual or debuting someone that is so fascinating. Certainly they know which publishers routinely spend money with them — and the ad people, wanting to project goodwill — certainly whisper into the ears of the book editors.
All things being equal on merit, tie-breakers go to those who support them. I wonder how many will get reviewed. Politics play a role as well. The Times favors books that promote a liberal agenda.
They will review books that reflect other views — just fewer of them. If your book aligns with the views, experiences, needs or desires of the reviewer, you are sure to get more attention. Sometimes your book gets into the right hands at the right time.
Did You See These Posts?4 Responses to “Retirement Heist Reviewed In The New York Times” William Lekas October 27, at pm # Over the years we saw Enron then Worldcom completely rip off their employees with “creative” financing and exploiting pension funds to hide malfeasance and bad business.
“State of Exception/Estado de Excepción,” the exhibition created at the Institute for Humanities as a collaboration between artist Amanda Krugliak, photographer Richard Barnes, and Professor De León, based on his book “The Land of Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail,” is now on display at the Parsons School of Design in New York.
Judging from how the Times magazine’s excerpt from Guy Deutscher’s new book has been one of the most read pieces in the paper for over a week now, the book is on its way to libating readers.
NEW YORK—Albert Oehlen’s solo exhibition at the New Museum was recently reviewed by Roberta Smith of the New York Times.. Review: Albert Oehlen, a Master of Disciplined Excess By Roberta Smith JUNE 11, The German artist Albert Oehlen has been painting up a storm for more than 30 years, producing canvases that promulgate one kind of cross-fertilized chaos or another.
A scholarly Journal consists of articles that have been reviewed (refereed) by the authors peers - an editorial board of specialists in the field of research who evaluate the content and methodology of the author(s)' work and results. In the case of The New York Times channel, for example, you could setup a recipe such that that if a popular article is published to The New York Times, then the article will be saved to your Pocket account for you to read later.